The model the rest of the world has been using for centuries.
Cooperative purchasing. members pool capital, one member is awarded the pooled value per cycle, no compound interest. exists in nearly every market on earth. Different names, same structure. This page documents the major variants by country, their regulatory frameworks, and the gap that Savings.Club fills in the United States.
The global table.
Cooperative-financing models by country, founding date, approximate active member count, primary regulator, and structural notes. Not exhaustive. informal models exist in essentially every culture. but covers the formalized markets.
| Country / region | Model | Founded | Members | Regulator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | Bausparkasse | 1885 | 30M | BaFin (federal financial regulator) |
| Brazil | Consórcio | 1962 | 13M | Banco Central do Brasil |
| Mexico | Tanda | 1700s+ | millions (informal) | Largely informal; some formalized as ROSCAs |
| India | Chit Fund | 1900s+ | ~10M+ | Chit Funds Act 1982 (state-level oversight) |
| West Africa (Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal) | Susu | 1700s+ | tens of millions | Largely informal, some bank-formalized programs |
| South Korea | Kye / Bisi | 1500s+ | cultural backbone | Informal |
| Caribbean / Trinidad | Sou-Sou / Partner | 1700s+ | community-scale | Informal |
| China | Hui (会) | 1000s+ | cultural fixture | Mostly informal |
| Vietnam | Hụi | centuries | cultural fixture | Civil Code 2015 (formal recognition) |
| Austria + Czech Republic | Bausparkasse (variant) | late 1800s | tens of millions combined | National financial regulators |
THE VARIANTS
Different names, same structure.
Germany, Bausparkasse
Closed-end home savings system. Members contribute monthly into a pooled fund; receive a low-rate housing loan once a savings target is met. Statute: Bausparkassengesetz (1972, amended).
Brazil, Consórcio
Cooperative purchasing groups for vehicles, real estate, equipment. Open to any asset class. Statute: Lei 11.795/2008. The largest single market in the world for cooperative consumer financing.
Mexico, Tanda
Rotating savings groups, traditionally informal among friends and family. Each member contributes weekly or monthly; one member receives the pooled amount per cycle. Cultural backbone of underbanked communities.
India, Chit Fund
Combined savings + lottery + lending. Members bid for the monthly pool. the lowest bid wins, with the discount distributed to others as savings credits. Heavily regulated post-2000s scandals.
West Africa (Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal), Susu
Daily / weekly contribution circles. A "susu collector" visits members daily; members receive their pooled amount on a rotating basis. Migrated to West African diasporas worldwide.
South Korea, Kye / Bisi
Centuries-old rotating savings groups. Often organized around extended family, alumni networks, or workplace cohorts. Strong social-trust enforcement.
Caribbean / Trinidad, Sou-Sou / Partner
Rotating savings circles in Caribbean diaspora communities, including substantial use in NYC, Miami, and Toronto. Same structure as West African susu.
China, Hui (会)
Rotating credit associations, organized within family and clan networks. Predates modern banking by centuries. Mandarin term: 会 (huì).
Vietnam, Hụi
Vietnamese cousin of Chinese hui. Formally recognized in the 2015 Civil Code as a regulated savings/credit form.
Austria + Czech Republic, Bausparkasse (variant)
German Bausparkasse model adapted across Central Europe. Austria and Czech Republic both have their own statutes. The model dominates housing finance in these markets.
THE U.S. ANOMALY
The world's largest economy doesn't have a mature cooperative-purchasing market.
Roughly 60+ million people across Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, and Brazil are active in formal cooperative-purchasing programs right now. Hundreds of millions more participate informally across Africa, Latin America, and Asia. The United States has roughly zero. until Savings.Club. The reason isn't market viability. the U.S. is a bigger consumer-finance market than all the formal cooperative markets combined. The reason is historical: New Deal-era housing standardization + post-WWII consumer-credit expansion made traditional bank lending so dominant that the alternative never developed at scale. We're filling that gap.
COMMON QUESTIONS
Common questions.
A few historical reasons: (1) the New Deal-era standardization of the 30-year mortgage and the rise of the FHA + VA loan systems crowded out alternatives in housing; (2) the dominant U.S. bank-lending model + securitization through the GSEs (Fannie, Freddie) made traditional credit so available that cooperative alternatives were redundant for prime borrowers; (3) cooperative savings was historically associated with credit unions, which exist but are smaller-scale than the bank market. The result: cooperative purchasing exists informally (church savings groups, ROSCAs in immigrant communities) but isn't a regulated, scaled product. Savings.Club is filling that gap.
The model has worked for centuries. Now it's available in the U.S.
See what a Purchasing Voucher would keep on your own car or home. No credit check, no account needed.