RESEARCH & PAPERS

The evidence is not anecdotal.
It is institutional.

The Bank for International Settlements, the Wharton School, and the Federal Reserve have all studied and validated the savings club model. These are not opinion pieces. They are peer-reviewed research from the most credible institutions in global finance.

Bank for International Settlements

Savings-and-Credit Contracts

van Doornik, B.; Fazio, D.; Pinheiro, R.; Sekkel, J. (2024). BIS Working Paper No. 1236.

"Savings-and-credit contracts can expand access to credit and dominate classic loan contracts."

The BIS is the central bank of central banks, serving 63 member central banks representing 95% of world GDP. This working paper provides the first formal economic model proving that consorcio-style contracts are not merely alternatives to bank loans but can structurally outperform them.

Why this matters

Proves that savings-and-credit contracts are "a more efficient separating device than a single down payment" and can "expand access to credit" beyond what traditional lending achieves.

Read the full paper (PDF)

Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Consorcios and Brazil's Consumer Credit Innovation

Addison, M.E. (2006). Reginald H. Jones Thesis Prize Winner.

"Automaker-administered consorcios are dominant market players serving both credit-constrained consumers and middle-class savers."

This thesis won the Reginald H. Jones Prize, awarded to the best thesis at the Lauder Institute of Management and International Studies. It documents how Honda alone had delivered over 2 million vehicles through its consorcio program by 2006, and how the model serves both low-income and middle-class consumers.

Why this matters

Establishes that consorcios are not a fringe product for the underbanked but a mainstream financial instrument used by millions of middle-class consumers, administered by the world's largest automakers.

Read the full thesis (PDF)

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Alternative Financial Vehicles: Rotating Savings and Credit Associations (ROSCAs)

Hevener, C.C. (2006). Community Development Discussion Paper.

"Early forms of U.S. savings and loan associations exhibited similar characteristics" to ROSCAs, delivering "lower transaction costs passed along to members, resulting in lower cost loans."

The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia examines how rotating savings and credit associations function globally and documents their historical presence in the United States. The paper establishes that these structures reduce costs by eliminating intermediary profit extraction.

Why this matters

Confirms that the savings club model is not foreign to America. Early U.S. savings and loan associations used the same principles. The Fed validates that member-pooled structures deliver lower costs than intermediated lending.

Read the full paper (PDF)

THE PATTERN

The BIS proves the model is economically superior. Wharton proves it works at scale with the world's largest automakers. The Federal Reserve proves it has historical precedent in America itself. Three independent institutions, three different methodologies, one conclusion: pooled savings structures outperform intermediated lending for consumers.

See the global evidence

These papers validate what 25 million Germans, half of Austria, and 12.76 million Brazilians already know. Explore the institutions, the automakers, and the numbers on our Global Evidence page.

View Global Evidence

Step 1 of 4

Let's get started

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can find the best savings club for you.

What would you like to finance?

Select the type of asset you are interested in.

Estimated value?

How much do you anticipate the asset will cost? This is just an estimate to help us find the right club for you.

$

Monthly plans available at standard pricing.

Review your information

Make sure everything looks right before we check availability.

Name
Email
Phone
State

Asset Type
Estimated Value